The Influence of Gas Type and Flow Rate on Plasma Jet Length and Gas Temperature

Main Article Content

Mohammed H. Ahmed
https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9055-6936
Hammad R. Humud
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6942-4333

Abstract

This study developed a plasma jet system using a power source that provides a high voltage of 10 kV and a total output power of 30 W. The system operates with three gases: air, nitrogen, and argon. The setup features a plasma torch placed within a steel tube with an internal diameter of 1.4 mm and a length of 5 cm. The research focused on the significance of gas temperature and plasma jet length, investigating how the type of gas and its flow rate influence these parameters. Electrical diagnostics were performed on the system using a high-voltage probe and a calibrated current probe with resistive measurements. The working gas temperature was found to be close to the ambient temperature across various flow rates. Nitrogen exhibited the highest temperature, measuring 22.8°C at a gas flow rate of 1 L/min and decreasing slightly to 22.6°C at 5 L/min. Air showed a relatively stable temperature, with 22.4°C at 1L/min and 22.3°C at 5 L/min. Argon had the lowest temperature, with 22.6°C at 1 L/min, decreasing to 21.8°C at 5 L/min. The plasma jet length varied by gas type, with argon producing the longest jet 5.6 cm, followed by air 4.1 cm and nitrogen 2.6 cm at a gas flow rate of 5 L/min. The jet length increased with higher gas flow rates for all three gases. The system operates with air, nitrogen, and argon, maintaining near-ambient temperatures, making it suitable for biological and medical applications like seed germination and wound sterilization.

Received: May, 31, 2024 Revised:  Dec. 09, 2025 Accepted: Feb.20, 2025

Article Details

Section

Articles

How to Cite

1.
Ahmed MH, Humud HR. The Influence of Gas Type and Flow Rate on Plasma Jet Length and Gas Temperature. IJP [Internet]. 2025 Sep. 1 [cited 2025 Sep. 1];23(3):128-36. Available from: https://ijp.uobaghdad.edu.iq/index.php/physics/article/view/1305

References

M. Domonkos, P. Tichá, J. Trejbal, and P. Demo, Appl. Sci. 11, 4809 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11114809 .

2. A. Bogaerts, E. Neyts, R. Gijbels, and J. Van Der Mullen, Spectrochim. Acta Part B Atom. Spectros. 57, 609 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0584-8547(01)00406-2.

3. S. Sharma, R. Chalise, S. Basnet, H. P. Lamichhane, and R. Khanal, Phys. Plasmas 31, 043509 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0187159.

4. T. Wang, J. Wang, S. Wang, L. Lv, M. Li, and L. Shi, App. Surf. Sci. 570, 151258 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2021.151258.

5. S. Milan and S. Pavel, Plasma Sour. Sci. Tech. 17, 020201 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1088/0963-0252/17/2/020201.

6. A. Shashurin, M. Keidar, S. Bronnikov, R. A. Jurjus, and M. A. Stepp, Appl. Phys. Lett. 93, 181501 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3020223.

7. J.-W. Lackmann, G. Bruno, H. Jablonowski, F. Kogelheide, B. Offerhaus, J. Held, V. Schulz-Von Der Gathen, K. Stapelmann, T. Von Woedtke, and K. Wende, PLOS ONE 14, e0216606 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0216606.

8. S. Bekeschus, B. Poschkamp, and J. Van Der Linde, Biomaterials 278, 120433 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2020.120433.

9. S. Yoshimura, Y. Otsubo, A. Yamashita, and K. Ishikawa, Japanese J. Appl. Phys. 60, 010502 (2021). https://doi.org/10.35848/1347-4065/abcbd2.

10. O. A. Emelyanov, E. G. Feklistov, N. V. Smirnova, K. A. Kolbe, E. V. Zinoviev, M. S. Asadulaev, A. A. Popov, A. S. Shabunin, and K. F. Osmanov, AIP Conf. Proc. 2179, 020006 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5135479.

11. B.-S. Lou, J.-H. Hsieh, C.-M. Chen, C.-W. Hou, H.-Y. Wu, P.-Y. Chou, C.-H. Lai, and J.-W. Lee, Front. Bioeng. Biotech. 8, 683 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2020.00683.

12. S. Darmawati, A. Rohmani, L. H. Nurani, M. E. Prastiyanto, S. S. Dewi, N. Salsabila, E. S. Wahyuningtyas, F. Murdiya, I. M. Sikumbang, R. N. Rohmah, Y. A. Fatimah, A. Widiyanto, T. Ishijima, J. Sugama, T. Nakatani, and N. Nasruddin, Clinic. Plasma Med. 14, 100085 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpme.2019.100085.

13. Z. Shahbazi Rad and F. Abbasi Davani, Measurement 155, 107545 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2020.107545.

14. S. Darmawati, N. Nasruddin, P. Kurniasiwi, A. Mukaromah, A. Iswara, G. S. A. Putri, H. Rahayu, E. S. Wahyuningtyas, H. Lutfiyati, and A. Kartikadewi, Plasma Med. 10, 259 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1615/PlasmaMed.2021037264.

15. K. Lotfy, AIP Advan. 10, 015303 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5099923.

16. P. Thana, C. Kuensaen, P. Poramapijitwat, S. Sarapirom, L. Yu, and D. Boonyawan, Surf. Coat. Tech. 400, 126229 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfcoat.2020.126229.

17. G. Liu, F. Shi, Q. Wang, Z. Zhang, J. Guo, and J. Zhuang, Microchem. J. 183, 107973 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.microc.2022.107973.

18. S. Lata, S. Chakravorty, T. Mitra, P. K. Pradhan, S. Mohanty, P. Patel, E. Jha, P. K. Panda, S. K. Verma, and M. Suar, Mat. Today Bio 13, 100200 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtbio.2021.100200.

19. H. R. Humud, Q. A. Abbas, and K. F. Abdullah, Der Pharm. Lett. 8, 229 (2016).

20. H. Whiley, T. P. Keerthirathne, E. J. Kuhn, M. A. Nisar, A. Sibley, P. Speck, and K. E. Ross, Electrochem 3, 276 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/electrochem3020019.

21. R. Zouzelka, J. Olejnicek, P. Ksirova, Z. Hubicka, J. Duchon, I. Martiniakova, B. Muzikova, M. Mergl, M. Kalbac, L. Brabec, M. Kocirik, M. Remzova, E. Vaneckova, and J. Rathousky, Nanomaterials 11, 3254 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11123254 .

22. H. R. Humud, Iraqi J. Phys. 11, 110 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30723/ijp.v11i20.388.

23. E. Patrakova, M. Biryukov, O. Troitskaya, P. Gugin, E. Milakhina, D. Semenov, J. Poletaeva, E. Ryabchikova, D. Novak, N. Kryachkova, A. Polyakova, M. Zhilnikova, D. Zakrevsky, I. Schweigert, and O. Koval, Cells 12, 290 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/cells12020290.

24. A. Khlyustova, C. Labay, Z. Machala, M.-P. Ginebra, and C. Canal, Front. Chem. Sci. Eng. 13, 238 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11705-019-1801-8.

25. H. R. Humud, Iraqi J. Phys. 10, 53 (2012).

26. H. M. Abdulwahab and H. R. Humud, AIP Conf. Proc. 2977, 040143 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0183707.

27. C. Corbella, S. Portal, and M. Keidar, Plasma 6, 72 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3390/plasma6010007.

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>