Elastic and Inelastic Coulomb Transitions in 50,52Cr
Main Article Content
Abstract
The elastic and inelastic longitudinal electron scattering form factors in of chromium isotopes (50,52Cr) isotopes were studied using the radial wave functions of a transformed harmonic oscillator potential in the local scale transformation technique. Occupation numbers from configuration mixing using the Hsieh-Wildenthal (HW) method for 50,52Cr were considered in parallel with those obtained using the adjusted occupation numbers. For shell interactions, the model space for HW interaction is restricted to the 1d3/2 and 1f7/2 subshells. The charge density distributions in the ground state and differential electron scattering cross-sections were computed. The inelastic form factors were studied by including core polarization using the Bohr-Mottelson model. For 50Cr, the three C2 transitions and the two C4 transitions were investigated. For 52Cr, the inelastic form factor for the two C2 transitions and for the two C4 transitions is investigated. In general, the use of the transformed harmonic-oscillator (THO) basis proved itself to be a good candidate to study stable nuclei, where good results (elastic and inelastic Coulomb form factors and differential cross sections) were obtained for 50,52Cr isotopes.
Article Details
Issue
Section
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
© 2023 The Author(s). Published by the College of Science, University of Baghdad. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
References
1. C. J. Batty, E. Friedman, H. J. Gils, and H. Rebel, Adv. Nucl. Phy. 19, 1 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-9907-10_1.
2. A. A. M. Hussein and G. N. Flaiyh, East Eur. J. Phys. 2023 (1), 82 (2023). https://doi.org/10.26565/2312-4334-2023-1-09.
3. G. N. Flaiyh and S. A. Rahia, Iraqi J. Phys. 19 (50), 60 (2021). https://doi.org/10.30723/ijp.v19i50.675.
4. A. N. Antonov, P. E. Hodgson, and I. Z. Petkov, Nucleon Momentum and Density Distributions in Nuclei (Clarendon Press. UK, 1988).
5. D. Murshedi and A. D. Salman, J. Nucl. Sci. 7 (1), 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1501/nuclear.2023.50.
6. C. A. Bertulani, Nuclear Physics in a Nutshell (Princeton University Press, 2007). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400839322.
7. A. R. Radhi, A. K. Hamoudi, and A. R. Ridha, Iraqi J. Sci. 54 (2), 324 (2013).
8. A. R. Ridha, Iraqi J. Phys. 14 (30), 42 (2019). https://doi.org/10.30723/ij p.v14i30.199.
9. A. R. Ridha and W. Z. Majeed, Iraqi J. Sci. 63 (3), 977 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2022.63.3.7.
10. E. Yazdankish, Int. J. Mod. Phys. E, 29 (6), 2050032 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218301320500329.
11. H. F. Ojaimi and A. R. Ridha, in 2022 International Congress on Human-Computer Interaction, Optimization and Robotic Applications (HORA), IEEE, 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/HORA55278.2022.9799913.
12. A. Fatah and A. Mohammed, Kirkuk Univ. Journal-Scientific Stud., 18 (2), 15 (2023). https://doi.org/10.32894/kujss.2023.138864.1096.
13. A. A. Alzubadi and L. J. Abbas, Phys. At. Nucl. 86 (4), 370 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063778823040026.
14. O. Q. Afar and F. Z. Majeed, J. Phys. Conference Series, 1829 (1), 012026 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1829/1/012026.
15. S. S. Odah and A. R. Ridha, Iraqi J. Sci. 63 (9), 3737 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2022.63.9.8.
16. S. S. Odah and A. R. Ridha,in AIP Conf. Proc. 2437 (19), 020115(1) (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0092614.
17. J. N. Ginocchio, Ann. Phys. (N. Y). 159 (2), 467 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4916(85)90120-4.
18. S. A. J. Khalaf and A. R. Ridha, Iraqi J. Sci. 64 (2), 668 (2023). https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2023.6.
19. S. A. J. Khalaf and A. R. Ridha, in AIP Conf. Proc. AIP Publishing, 2922 (1), 090005 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0183082.
20. A. M. Hameed and A. R. Ridha, Iraqi J. Sci. 64 (5), 2250 (2023). https://doi.org/10.24996/ijs.2023.64.5.13.
21. H. De Vries, C. W. De Jager, and C. De Vries, At. Data Nucl. Data Tables, 36(3), 495 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1016/0092-640X(87)90013-1.
22. J. W. Lightbody, Jr. J. B.Bellicard, J. M. Cavedon, B.Frois, D. Goutte, M. Huet, Ph. Leconte, A. Nakada, Phan Xuan Ho, S. K. Platchkov, and S. Turck-Chieze, Phys. Rev. C 27(1), 113 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.27.113.
23. S. T. Hsieh, X. Ji, R. Mooy, and B. H. Wildenthal, in AIP Conf. Proc. 142, 357 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.35637.
24. S. Karataglidis and K. Amos, Phys. Rev. C, 71(6), 064601 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.71.064601.
25. B.A. Brown, B.H. Wildenthal, C. F. Williamson, F. N. Rad, and S. Kowalski, Phys. Rev. C, 32(4), 1127, Oct. (1985). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.32.1127.
26. B. A. Brown and W. D. M. Rae, “Nushell @ MSU, MSU-NSCL report” 1 (2007).
27. L. R. B. Elton, Nuclear Sizes. (Oxford University Press, 1961).
28. T. de Forest and J. D. Walecka, Adv. Phys. 15 (57), 1 (1966). https://doi.org/10.1080/00018736600101254.
29. Falah H. Abd and Mohanad H. Oleiwi, in AIP Conf. Proc. 2398 (1), 020032 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0093637.
30. G. B. Arfken, H. J. Weber, and F. E. Harris, Mathematical Methods for Physicists (Elsevier, 2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/C2009-0-30629-7.
31. A. N. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (World Scientific, 1998).
32. M. H. Oleiwi, Science and Technology of Nuclear Installations 2021(1), 020032 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/6639185.
33. 33. J. A. M. W. Greiner, Nuclear Models (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg New York, 1996). https://doi.org/10.11107/978·3·642·609711·1.